From: Falcon Area: Base of Set To: John Youril 21 May 95 23:48:02 Subject: evil satanists UpdReq Greetings, John! 18 May 95 e.v. 06:01, John Youril wrote to Falcon: F>> Are there any satanists who are not as ... "mostly harmless" F>> ... as LaVey ? JY> No one is mostly harmless. No one is harmless - not even xians. But "mostly harmless"? Xians? You bet! Never mind - what about my inital question? You know any "darker" / "more evil" / whatever-you-call-it Satanists? sign of chaos 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Falcon Area: Base of Set To: Albert Saperstein 21 May 95 23:49:36 Subject: evil satanists UpdReq Greetings, Albert! 18 May 95 e.v. 23:23, Albert Saperstein wrote to Falcon: AS> Define "mostly harless". Most of what I read in The Satanic Bible is revolting for xian sheep, but naturally for any mage. Not many of the mages I know would title it "evil". sign of chaos 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Falcon Area: Base of Set To: Pope Erik Arneson 21 May 95 23:51:08 Subject: evil satanists UpdReq Greetings, Pope! 15 May 95 e.v. 20:36, Pope Erik Arneson wrote to Falcon: >> Are there any satanists who are not as ... "mostly harmless" ... >> as LaVey ? PEA> Probably, but I betcha they don't get very far in life. Ya sure? I claim to be somewhat (not too far) beyond LaVey, and I'm doing well. sign of chaos 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Macfinn Area: Base of Set To: Aragorn 23 May 95 23:57:28 Subject: Echo Statement (Periodic Post) UpdReq A> Hi. There's like no traffic on this. Is it still here, or what? Later. As far as I know it is. Blessed Beast (humor) =M= 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718