From: Jeff Trowbridge Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 29 Mar 95 09:32:36 Subject: pgp availability UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi All, I have friends in the Phoenix, Az, Milwaukee, WI, and San Diego, Ca areas that are looking for local BBS's where they can get PGP. Anybody in those areas know of any? Thanks, Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: encryption means never having to say you're sorry iQCVAwUBL3mZoXPq8B1oZhD9AQFB+wP+IeTSxkFxCpFwjIdKGYrtM+2vq1wJfBHM 88aIa/Dnl06b90LBS30qoVPBXM3FmAH94ItNQHgq+AxSkM7bQEtxpFscZN6H89JF 4vQeUOT/ULWsvgmvv2ayuTce38RcG8pW82dEJhmB4uLyeEhoippdr3f4BbRyjTOR ytiXfzPaNpM= =wxRK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... Veni, Vidi, Clinti -- I Came, I Saw, I Lied. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jay Banks Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 31 Mar 95 00:56:00 Subject: PGP questions!!! UpdReq Hey, Just had a few questions about PGP. 1. a. Saw some messages on here about Bluewave & PGP shells; what about OLX? Any of the shells work well with OLX? b. I've noticed I can encrypt, say an EXE file or a GIF and it still works fine un-encrypted. Could you convert it and send a non-text file as e-mail using PGP, kind of like using UUENCODE or something similar? 2. a. I'm interested in sending & receiving test messages to see if I've got PGP working right, anybody care to try a few messages with me? Could do it with Internet e-mail or through my board C-TEK BBS 903.723.8855 b. Encryption has kind of become a hobby with me, does anybody know good locations for encryption related material? I'm really looking for programs to break encrypted files be it DES, Wordperfect & Word password protected files and other encryption methods. TTYL -=JB=- jay.banks@c-tek.woodybbs.com --- * QMPro 1.0 29-0651 * Cyber Technology uniting the world C-TEK BBS 903.723.885 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: John Roman Area: Public Key Encryption To: Michael Babcock 30 Mar 95 08:28:52 Subject: Golded @enc: PGP UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Michael! 27 Mar 95 16:35, Michael Babcock wrote to JOHN ROMAN: MB> [PGP SIGN CLEAR] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ JR>> (John Roman uses PGP) MB> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hmm, AUTO-PGP says you should sign your text :) GoldED says your AUTO-PGP may not always work so well...... And yes, I should remember to do that. JR>> Interesting...I wonder if you could set it up to toss them to JR>> NUL? (While I'm kidding, I'm sure it's been tried). MB> It says that it is not advisable to simply erase all of this MB> alternately tossed email, but that it IS possible... Not advisable because it violates P4 (hope I got that right), but tossing it to oblivion probably does work just fine. John ... Attention: Unattended children will be sold as slaves. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBL3rdJg4f7XXjzQ6JAQGniwP/UWjdFKkeuITEC+FBvsFpIdutk/VKczmi L7o95ifv7HjV43i9/5VytHDJ8vh2ploTkUCwHMzZA8wpm+nzEGn1at7aH+0z6FT2 n2C0hMuYcyIswaiAm8m3tRVDoqyGhSFeDarkgEwuFv8XOJ0XYJj6bWcLvwZ474AS U06fi+n+jVA= =ZooP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Peter Bradie Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jerome Greene 29 Mar 95 21:52:12 Subject: Bluewave & pgp UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- JG> Both programs are worth the price of a phone call to check out. I JG> haven't seen any problems at my system with either of them. I have JG> with PGPBlue though. And this recent lack of support problem for it JG> should concern you. If for no other reason, then as a prospective JG> customer. Hi, Jerome. I've not had any problem with PGPBlue, but then I've not tried to put it through all its paces. It also irks me when there's no support for something I've paid for; it's the principle of the thing. ___--BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBL3orDYSYnLg9ADyZAQG+DQP/WM8QboPOZM2eEiMwnGUtnZrHA4X3oHpC QMpey6zuDoM4QqY+qdYY/4OelVWfyci98+HL4xn9e/IdD9ve9Oiz1LhauieFLBsD JzYQ8QT8lbnUrbrQgWz2sxxMnkq5hbt+Mn8CDkcedLn/i6uClEsIMU3I5/n1f48s eY9xdBe3kOk= =xmlr ___--END PGP SIGNATURE----- ~~~ PGPBLUE 3.0 ... Illegitimi Non Carborundum! ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.10 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Peter Bradie Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 29 Mar 95 21:55:14 Subject: Bluewave & pgp UpdReq -=> Quoting John Schofield to Peter Bradie <=- JS> Something ate your sig lines. Perhaps the aardvark got hungry. That IS weird. But I doubt the arrdvark did it... ... Old age and treachery will always defeat youth and inexperience. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.10 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Peter Bradie Area: Public Key Encryption To: L P 29 Mar 95 22:10:20 Subject: Re: internet gateway & f UpdReq -=> Quoting L P to David Chessler <=- LP> I really don't have a clue about the big problem with privacy. There seems to be a weird, and erroneous, idea that the sysop is responsible for message traffic they cannot read... that encrypted traffic is almost plotting illegal acts by definition, otherwise they wouldn't need privacy. I guess they'll love the Exon Amendment which WILL make them liable for message traffic. ... Ignorance is curable... stupidity isn't! ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.10 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jym Fox Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 30 Mar 95 12:23:00 Subject: Keys.... UpdReq Checking links for this echo...... Jym ... Trees Can Break Wind - film at 11 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: John Schofield Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jeffrey Bloss 30 Mar 95 23:52:42 Subject: Poker? 1/2 UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- --== Traditional mental poker is built around encrypting and re-encrypting JB> the "cards" with public/private key pairs or dedicated session keys JB> so that the players and the dealer have no previous knowledge of the JB> other players' hand. The necessary "blindness" is accomplished JB> through encryption that's non grata in FIDO. JB> We can blind the players by using "meaningless" CRC/HASH/SIGNATURE JB> values to represent the cards, but the dealer, having previous JB> knowledge of these bi-directional (in dealer terms) values, can set up JB> a "cheat" with any other player(s). JB> How do we get around this, but not use encrypted messages? Best of luck to you, but I don't think you can. I hesitate to use absolutes, but I don't think it's possible. However, you CAN do successful mental poker now using encrypted private e-mail, transmitted through the SecureMail network. I'm bowing out of this thread with this message, except to shoot holes (err, I mean point out problems) in any scheme you come up with. {grin} John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.7 Comment: The Sprawl BBS at +1-818-342-5127 -- your privacy source! iQCVAwUBL3u0dGj9fvT+ukJdAQFwNgP+IsUImuuuX5RvFjoExR+Whjw4cFcts/GN bUICR4GAsIEDuuZ2PU6Wy90Hm/ZncDTStiKKdTXe+uGFYo7mumzIvL2QQvsxV34W LMQpg0ES0ih4QneJDpTHvl7pNfidT+pauVUlhP0jl2TBZF+cA4iBAQRmawShv0xW WN5/lDSN0rU= =9Svk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- **EZ-PGP v1.07 ... "What do you mean you reformatted the cat?" 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718