From: Michael Mcbroom Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 13 Jan 95 13:24:00 Subject: Electronic Privacy BBS Li Pvt UpdReq ->1:102/903 Hi John, sounds interesting. Howaboud I just netmail the application to you? JS>BBS Name : The 2nd Amendment BBS JS>SysOp's Name (or JS> pseudonym) : Michael McBroom (aka Bodhi) JS>Year and month BBS JS> started : October, 1993 JS>BBS Location JS> (City, state and JS> country, *not* JS> mailing address): Whittier, CA USA JS>BBS Phone Number(s): 310-902-0252 JS>Number of Lines : 1 for now JS>Modem type(s) : 14.4k JS>Are 300 or 1200 BPS JS> callers welcome?: 1200 yes, 300 no -- although this is not etched in stone. JS>Network memberships JS> (include JS> addresses) : FIDO 1:102/499 Paul Revere Net 176:100/25 SurvNet 9:6300/499 (soon to be 9:3100/499) DnA 66:310/0 RIME #5551 JS>BBS Software : TriBBS/Front Door JS>Cost (include time JS> and download JS> limits) : Free JS>Short Description JS> (75-word limit) : The 2nd Amendment BBS is dedicated to the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms. We have over 150 international echomail conferences on line, covering a wide range of subjects, and are still growing. Doors and files are also available. Liberal access privileges after validation. * OLX 2.1 TD * Jackboot Janet and the Secret Police: Sting's Drag Group. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Shawn McMahon 7 Jan 95 21:36:46 Subject: Re: KEY REVOKE UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Shawn McMahon wrote in a message to jason carr: jc> I've demonstrated the ease of guessing pwords here at work for my jc> underlings... SM> My friend's face went white when he saw his favorite SM> password, that he's used on several BBSes, right there in SM> the list... :-) Yep. SM> not *MY* fault he used his wife's first name as a password. SM> And then replaced it with his license plate number... My boss logged onto my bbs and used the =same= =pass= that he used for his files at work. Is that insane or what? jason ... Let's share our surpluses. Everybody wins. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP_ECHO: CypherEcho to the gods... iQCVAwUBLw960UjhGzlN9lCZAQGQLAP8Dbd+QzXNy3dgSu302fmEorzFcrhccQbb X+CQK3B8UlkzIia8VPVhn//El0fAJ/+qIa1x55IhZlaCl46I4DLldyBhlGtidKGv 9vz9KswbUmR8UVa3gRLf3PEhK8E/ZlcNd2IcuWO2gereOukwGIl1ipJvcZq2BPdo YnczFf89LSE= =DXZS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... Key fingerprint = 60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: mark lewis 14 Jan 95 19:55:32 Subject: KEY REVOKE UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- jc> Just delete the revocation from your ring and add in this jc> file. All will be well, Grasshopper. ml> oh?? what about his secret key?? Well, it's the same thing he would have re-added after a proper revocation, right? I still think it will work. If it does, anyone with a copy of your key should be able to extract it back out to you. All is not lost... I'm going to increase my PKEY_DROP archive to 600 so that accidentally revoked keys can be re-added. jason ... You're a Redneck if: Your kids call you "Uncle Dad". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP_ECHO: CypherEcho to the gods... iQCVAwUBLxiflkjhGzlN9lCZAQGJLAQAko27TA3EbA/PaCNjqJA4t1yHiSj/H2B2 xPxAgjutKrvhS29mQ0kruN9NyWE3m1vmp7EKA9zUeTInUSUj+vpngdJv0QBkRUIe TFlR3J8YRFjzLtNeeGfyvmsiB3ikO5IudDeB92CPydy8gCx1uwu75qYv25Sx2p6/ DrqgT0niUjU= =3VMg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... Key fingerprint = 60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Rich Veraa 14 Jan 95 20:09:40 Subject: KEY REVOKE UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Rich Veraa wrote in a message to jason carr: jc> DELete the revocation first (and save it to a file!). RV> But, if it's the key he prepared for posting, it's just his RV> public key... his private key is still revoked and no longer RV> exists in secring.pgp. If it were impossible to re-add the key back in by the pubkey =only=, then the current method of revocation would cause permanent loss of the pubkey. But that doesn't happen. One just extracts the revocation, removes it from the ring, then re-adopts the previously extracted pubkey. Whether the original pubkey is saved in the same dir (in a file extracted for the purpose of re-adding after the revocation), or retrieved from PKEY_DROP, or extracted from a friend's key, it's still the same information. I =think=. :) jason ... Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP_ECHO: CypherEcho to the gods... iQCVAwUBLxihKkjhGzlN9lCZAQGzVgP/c6PRftE152wXXkHCtkMVSq2qkLoxHi0z hxH5GkTe4Ve06AuuilRNWJ+m6Il3OHD+DC74r1624PnbOXKPBE3dQUG8N2w78K4j 518pyol9cXCPERYnb/zpB75gosCKuTMUq18GJ9mL3lIc0PcbIKbUIT/LIp+664nY EvOMq+g7Moo= =3sg6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... Key fingerprint = 60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Bell Area: Public Key Encryption To: BRIAN GIROUX 13 Jan 95 19:45:00 Subject: PGP LEGAL OUTSIDE US? UpdReq -=> Quoting Brian Giroux@1:225/330 to All <=- BG> I've seen someone around here use the "Comment" line "PGP 2.6 is BG> legal in Zone 1 so use it ", or something to that effect. My BG> question is this; what is Zone 1? US and Canada, I think. BG> There is a small thread in a local BG> echo about the legality of PGP, some people are under the impression BG> that it isn't allowed to leave the US, I _think_ that export is allowed to Canada without restriction. In any case, it already left for the rest of the world, probably within hours of its release, so everybody around the world has access to it. ... Way Too Much is Not Nearly Enough. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718