From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 6 Dec 94 11:04:00 Subject: cypherpunks UpdReq John Schofield wrote in a message to Alan Pugh: JS> ALT.POLITICS.LIBERTARIAN JS> COMP.ORG.EFF.NEWS JS> COMP.DCOM.TELECOM JS> COMP.SOCIETY.PRIVACY JS> ALT.CYBERPUNK.TECH JS> COMP.ORG.EFF.TALK JS> ALT.RADIO.PIRATE JS> SCI.CRYPT JS> ALT.CYBERPUNK JS> ALT.PRIVACY JS> ALT.SECURITY.PGP JS> ALT.2600 I just areafixed a buncha these. As I don't know which ones are really available and which ones aren't, I just made a wishlist. :) So just remove the ones I shouldn't have access to. Tnx! jason ... Give Me a Cookie! 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ian Lin Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jim Grubs, W8grt 4 Dec 94 10:25:12 Subject: legal PGP UpdReq JGW> PRZ isn't. What's that tell you? There is a point beyond JGW> which prudence turns into paranoia. No there isn't. I don't think PRZ has a choice. If he wanted to continue PGP 2.3a, he would not be legally allowed to. That's not a choice. ... I tried snorting Coke once, but the ice cubes got stuck in my nose. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ian Lin Area: Public Key Encryption To: Wes Landaker 4 Dec 94 10:29:18 Subject: legal PGP UpdReq WL> Then stick with it. =) And you can keep on using PKZip 1.10 and DOS WL> 3.3 as well, if you really feel that they are more than good enough as WL> well, eh? :) That's not the situation. Althought I won't upgrade my 486 to a Pentium. They have math bugs in them. You upgrade to get a better product. If the newer product isn't better (as with the Pentium or PGP > 2.3a) then you don't upgrade since it would in effect be downgrading. ... Warning: Coarse and violent nudity. Occasional language. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ian Lin Area: Public Key Encryption To: Rick Pali 4 Dec 94 10:27:14 Subject: PGP versions UpdReq RP> Cautious and paranoid are two different things. Good thing I'm just being cautious. ... Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky? 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ian Lin Area: Public Key Encryption To: Rich Veraa 4 Dec 94 10:28:16 Subject: PGP versions UpdReq RV> Paranoia is _not_ "being careful." It's a pathological _irrational_ RV> unreasonable fear. Paranoia is debilitating at best and violently RV> destructive at worst. Reservations for PGP > 2.3a are not illogical or irrational. PGP 2.3a's existence isn't now legal. Think about the choice given--there was none. I don't like that. ... Nize tagline. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ian Lin Area: Public Key Encryption To: Shawn Mcmahon 4 Dec 94 10:34:20 Subject: PGP versions UpdReq SM> But, Ian, you go right ahead using that buggy old version; the rest of SM> the world will keep progressing right on past you. You won't I have never ever run into a bug with PGP 2.3a. PGP > 2.3a is not to be trusted. Not yet. When I can look at the source myself and can understand what's in it, only then will I attest that it's a-ok and then I will recompile it. Maybe if Phil signs a form in blood swearing it's a-ok I would use it--MAYBE. SM> be able to read the stuff we write, or check our SM> signatures, but that won't inconvenience *US*; just you. It won't be of use to me since I don't care who anyone is here. I will not check signatures here. I can do it with pgp 2.6ui (it works) but I do not care. I caer only for those who I have real communications with and with important information. No one else seems to want to make the switch either. I will not since it would be a downgrade rather than an upgrade. I can't even get your keys to check signatures since the pkeys_drop echo is not available to me. Your point is lost on me as irrelevant since that's what it turns out to be. SM> While you're at it, though, please stop putting words in my SM> mouth. I'm quite capable of doing that myself. You did say what you said and I just noted you for it. ... I don't cheat; I play by the extended rules. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jack O'Neill Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 4 Dec 94 16:32:06 Subject: PGP VERSIONS UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello Christopher, Thursday December 01 1994 23:33, Christopher Baker wrote to Brian Giroux: CB> -+---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-+--- CB> In a message dated: 28 Nov 94, Brian Giroux was quoted as saying: BG>> What is the difference between PGP v2.6 (which I have), PGP v2.6.2 BG>> (which I often see being used), and PGP v2.7 (which I've only seen BG>> a few times)? CB> the main difference is that 2.6 is outdated. 2.6.2 is current. Not for us OS/2 users. :-{ Jack Freq PGPKEY for (guess what) my PGP Key. ... Real knowledge is to know the extent of ones ignorance. - --- GoldED/2 2.50.B1006+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.1 Comment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, ... iQCVAwUBLuI1mr9heO3mhXfZAQG5LgQAg0Rl1EmtUpkKwTZqx7jJofeB0FyxQHCE W1RDMHzYETQLv5C28PXIbePdif0RWYt9lmKHgaDMY2ty2lOlE3z5RVgV8iExG0v7 rirPglThKKck0cFet8FcmSxspPHh+YvXIfsNzCuymzKzd2X20M7BUDfe2BsjgOJ5 5VEXIW3uwFc= =TLz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Todd Jacobs 6 Dec 94 21:15:12 Subject: Re: PGP VERSIONS UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- -=> Quoting Todd Jacobs to Brian Giroux <=- TJ> 2.6.2 is a freeware version that corrects several minor TJ> entropy-related bugs in 2.6.2. 2.7 is a commercial version from ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What does this mean? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP_ECHO: CypherEcho to the gods... iQCVAwUBLuUMOEjhGzlN9lCZAQEM7QQAizL+9gGhrFDut+6P/61phvXqbBjv+osn MsXJvVRFuxzLb8DalhVcB7MKdweqcNIfR8l30pvpP5ucrJUW1aQvanHlPcH4nqYA irS1K3G54+rBt+wAcGJtMVMszpsAL1U3HRSG47ioKw1TfXtnbL6nuHj2wQ4s0OCh UkcbQFZJcEM= =f6Q7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- jc ... FREQ JASONKEY.ASC (60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61) // BlueWave > BW-PGP.BAT < PGP 2.6.2 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Cannell Area: Public Key Encryption To: Joe Eversole 6 Dec 94 21:38:58 Subject: Securemail UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a msg on , Joe Eversole of 1:231/1400@fidonet.org writes: JE> While I have you here, I am not listed (still) as NSMH for 1:231. JE> Is this your area or should I contact Jeff? (R11SMH) Make sure that you have a link and session password set up with Jeffrey Oxenreider at 226/560. Once that link is confiormed, he will notify me, and you will be in the map. You will need to ask your NC to add the UNSMH flag to your nodelist entry. Jim - International SecureMail Host (ISMH) PGP key 1024/B7822B3D fingerprint = 0F F4 79 06 3B 33 99 D1 07 36 66 66 80 85 76 B3 Protect your right to privacy. Say no to GAK. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBLuVLBSWTIMO3gis9AQEJCgP/baBj4sdnyBWag7t0/0B4aj72A1wOvt4y FxZP+ndIL/DSc/kElvGI+q2faKjzSjUYgPzyWuCjduAJdSTQJiSfnTkhDgrnizJj NfC4nUChQq/eCUVCjnsqncgn/t27ftN6XR1c3wul6IDs1xi5pLhvKmkzo4jPw7kv z4SQ1VTN+AA= =2rY0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718