From: Ron Bigalke Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 24 Nov 94 04:06:52 Subject: A question UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hiya people, A few weeks ago I ask a question in this echo but never saw a response if indeed there was one. So at the risk of annoying a few here, can anyone tell me why Canadians have access to the US version of PGP? Opinions are nice, but I'd like a reference or two of some treaty or something. Thanks for the time. Ron Moses did not bring down from Mt. Sinai the Ten Suggestions. ...MARS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUBLtRlqs+zloeePfJlAQFj/gP+JpR0wimShmus1I5cLKZ2SnRoiqzixKEy I3eI0ZvCPDOpySjiHDufQBiDKLRx7sFwb9FMG2cTk4CGpKfbtRgR2pP2xvN2haAe xZcRqG2anAI9x3s1leX8m5KaOXyqUCiJUkErbbq4O1E0WfibCLJA2TckE1qi7vNo Rn/RSdC3B5A= =MMXo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: jason carr 21 Nov 94 12:47:00 Subject: Lawyer 4/4 UpdReq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Basil Hoyl wrote in a message to All: I sent a copy of this thread to Phil. He was fascinated. I'm guessing future PGP versions will not accept keys with "book" type IDs. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: Ian Lin 22 Nov 94 09:15:00 Subject: PGP versions UpdReq > ... This sentance has threee errors. Cute. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: Ian Lin 9 Nov 94 09:11:00 Subject: legal PGP UpdReq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > CB> there is no reason to continue to use 2.3a unless you just want to > CB> stay behind the advancing technology. there are also people who refuse > CB> to upgrade from ZIP 1.10. go figure. > I'd rather stick with 2.3a. It seems a lot of people > are. PRZ isn't. What's that tell you? There is a point beyond which prudence turns into paranoia. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: Ian Hebert 16 Nov 94 12:01:00 Subject: GOP vs. Clipper...? UpdReq > CH> Even though I would rather have seen my party keep control of > CH> the legislative branch (home-team kind of thing :) I am hoping that > CH> since the Republicans say they are against "big government" they will > CH> help put Clipper in the pine box where it belongs. > CH> Does anybody have any educated info on this? > Wasn't it President Bush who started the whole Clipper nonsense? It started during his term at the un-elected bureaucrat level. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Mudge 16 Nov 94 17:08:00 Subject: GOP vs. Clipper...? UpdReq > Hello Carl! > Tuesday November 08 1994, Carl Hudkins writes to All: > CH> Even though I would rather have seen my party keep control of > CH> the legislative branch (home-team kind of thing :) I am hoping that > CH> since the Republicans say they are against "big government" they will > CH> help put Clipper in the pine box where it belongs. > CH> Does anybody have any educated info on this? > It was written under the Bush administration....even Maria Cantwell's > opposition to it was misguided...she thought it would hinder sales of US > products abroad. It probably would. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: Carl Hudkins 10 Nov 94 14:38:00 Subject: GOP vs. Clipper...? UpdReq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hey... > Even though I would rather have seen my party > keep control of > the legislative branch (home-team kind of thing :) I > am hoping that > since the Republicans say they are against "big > government" they will > help put Clipper in the pine box where it belongs. > Does anybody have any educated info on this? A chance remark by Newt Gingrich gave me the impression he's cyberspacee literate. At the very least, that means he'll understand the issues better than most of them. Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 12 Nov 94 17:43:00 Subject: GOP vs. Clipper...? UpdReq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > --====-- > CH> Even though I would rather have seen my party keep control of > CH> the legislative branch (home-team kind of thing :) I am hoping that > CH> since the Republicans say they are against "big government" they will > CH> help put Clipper in the pine box where it belongs. > CH> Does anybody have any educated info on this? > Clipper was started under the Bush administration. At the un-elected bureaucrat level... Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jim Grubs, W8GRT Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 23 Nov 94 21:41:00 Subject: PGP 2.6.2 OS/2 compile? UpdReq > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > In a message dated: 19 Nov 94, Wes Landaker was quoted as saying: > WL> Is there an OS/2 compile of PGP 2.6.2 out yet? =) If it's already > WL> been mentioned in here, I must have missed it completely. > MIT has had it for over a month. they are still sitting on it and Phil > is out of the country. [sigh] He's home now and has been for a week or so. Got an e-mail from him just today about his alt.security.pgp format. (i'm his feed for that.) Sincerely, Jim Grubs, W8GRT 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Ron Pritchett Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 27 Nov 94 21:11:04 Subject: Public Keys UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu Nov 24 1994 @ 09:10 Re: Public Keys John Schofield (1:102/903.0) wrote to Glen Todd: JS> In my CONFIG.TXT file in my PGP directory, I have the JS> following line: COMMENT="Call 818-345-8640 voice for info on JS> Keep Out magazine." Cool, it works with 2.6i also.... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.i Comment: Et tu, Uncle Sam? iQCVAgUBLtku3MhJ1qIrxvYxAQENjAP/buxeH19Jh1GGOUBmL4M3FIpBgdyi5oIA SvtNCi3qW8DW5tvyK8//l3A3h2UAypoRuWP04hUq6l9Zdh64pDiqURZc9+9X7Dic +IE2Va389wfhzpfEY+Mwu2L3w1HKzw/1IOcTJok4rCVR1fGwrm2bcZ5UvwNkVZn3 dYfBQnVqUTU= =TB4S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Ron Pritchett - 1024/2BC6F631 Team OS/2 FingerPrint = A8 4D 69 49 33 27 63 2E 36 F3 BF 59 69 0D FD 95 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: Stefan Hirth 27 Nov 94 16:09:06 Subject: Re: PGP UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated: 20 Nov 94, Stefan Hirth was quoted as saying: CB> Comment: PGP 2.6.2 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] SH> Why is this version only legal in Zone 1? i didn't say it was ONLY legal in Zone 1. i didn't use the word ONLY at all. the fact that it is legal in Zone 1 refers to its non-commercial, non-patent-infringing use. SH> Or, better: What is illegal eg in Germany? Getting this version SH> on disk or even via phone line, or just using it? you'd have to ask the German government. it would be illegal here for me to export it to Germany but U.S. laws have no force if someone already has it over there to my knowledge. here in the U.S. we are prohibited from exporting any strong encryption executable or source because we allowed our government [of the people] to restrict trade and information sharing. encryption here is classified as munitions under a regulation called ITAR. so try not to read any more into my posts than i put there. [grin] thanks. TTFN. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: PGP 2.6.2 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAwUBLtj1dssQPBL4miT5AQE41wP/We1KLOjQtJoQJqlDYmVrELSgMQ3STskm Jb+3kAWrdPD5+TiDDUSxU3rWvwbAspH7GDwwhXeZ3FwuCIG0Z1h0e1gAfgZKWF7z A1nLIfDMOXVmL9aubLKn320qM2mCndXHDIuptGr+f2Df7mFoVSI1BvkQ3LoVmf3X 1LnYm2F9eok= =cNgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Glen Todd Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 27 Nov 94 20:28:00 Subject: Public Keys UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Bright the day, Christopher! 23 Nov 94 22:17, Christopher Baker wrote to Glen Todd: CB> add: CB> comment = Whatever comment text you want but keep it short here Thanks -- got it. Wind to thy wings, Glen - --- GoldED 2.42.G0615 ... Coloring Book of Shadows. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Joe McCarthy would have loved the Clipper chip. iQCVAwUBLtlOiB1IzyRmn+dFAQEIiAQAtCEn4XFoWTTY3USVYpbOO1Ufb6W409DN hNFCY2jqy3PNwQq5n/fWxu0r3GZN9ktvv7YEWejYR4SPH37cGNbSvxOA2fFNdZMp hMqWxw47qUmjLmdzy0/S5OGS/i8VZGPzPFddXgJebWcBWWi2xmLKaLkCgWePQCDw HyBSF+xZTOo= =hG21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Glen Todd Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 27 Nov 94 20:29:00 Subject: SecureMail UpdReq -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Bright the day, Christopher! 23 Nov 94 22:19, Christopher Baker wrote to Glen Todd: CB> |-+- 15 Dave Munhollon 1:128/86 X CB> | | CB> | SMH |-- 114 Allen Borovkoff 1:114/169 CB> | |-- 128 Dave Munhollon 1:128/86 X CB> | |-- 303 Thomas Lange 1:303/5 CB> | |-- 314 Doug Preston 1:314/5 Is 15 the SecureMail net number. Wind to thy wings, Glen - --- GoldED 2.42.G0615 ... Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies. - Nietzsche -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Joe McCarthy would have loved the Clipper chip. iQCVAwUBLtlO6h1IzyRmn+dFAQH2vQP/bSR54AFw0u/ntqGh6a8RS/XHN+L3flDp KpQIVQA/f22CzkIN0IjXRpsntVy17D6FX9YrR34JsfmqJPh1ulMkN+/EAj7IlfX3 Ay+zNO+aT5P6y54en85OKLIBNABYcJY5nGM2B8Gk482mtz/jghIjWEQwmvGPSlrV CO0hY9r8JA4= =7Jp/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718