From: Rich Veraa Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jason Carr 23 Aug 94 12:41:54 Subject: Re: Net 106 still at it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated:19 Aug 94, Jason Carr was quoted as saying: JC> Tim Devore wrote in a message to Scott Mills: JC> TD> No it's not "against the law" for the sysop to review any JC> TD> Net Mail. Find a copy of the Policy4 and read section 2 and JC> TD> it will fill you in on alot of stuff. JC> If it were that black/white. The ECPA may come into play where the JC> poster has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Not even that. The "reasonable expectation of privacy" clause appears in the section of the law defining _oral communications_ (voice phone conversations). All _electronic_ (digital) communications ARE private by law. IOW "public" messages must be labeled as such and available with no password. Everything else is _defined_ as private. Cheers, Rich -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6rv Comment: rveraa@newssun.med.miami.edu iQCVAgUBLln8m580iJ+tnwVVAQEq9gP/Xr+Nk7/r0V/LS5bw61W15MPZX0Ubc4ed UWKa5RyE2hlW0mSZw1t1kdZnPLq1S1O46kTu3Ep2q6wDEI9wlUsgBSPjLqVmJhDG oikUQWBPjKpA8h8/PSGlpCp7BXsQ5Ia3b1A2+GjFwh8F1cnAbvPXxQ+cTD5KcgQz fHqsa7caed8= =GyoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Alan Pugh Area: Public Key Encryption To: Rapier 24 Aug 94 15:28:18 Subject: Re: cypherpunks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Ra> Yes there is. Its available on the Internet, but with FIDO's gateways Ra> you shouldn't have a problem. To subscribe send a message to Ra> majordomo@toad.com with the following in the body: Ra> SUBSCRIBE cypherpunks Ra> But be warned! Its a high traffic list, carrying 30-50 messages a day. Ra> But the quality of the posts is excellent, if you are interested in the Ra> material. sounds like what i'm looking for. thanks. (what's another 50 messages per day?) amp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCxAgUBLlutTNQ9obngT6LhAQHiiQTgiiIK+FnCGYQOm8DajV7m4S4BZugRXQXC UqkCWXdNL5/UdaGZAPCsCSK3mXYxvgISO9nS5inCKuFiCqvMWtUH3uihvcCeRsmM rAjISikHzvQuhSKDpMhLFVW4/fit7EqQKTlAlUrZTuqLeIJ7A94ef8NSf2lm1Z1v UCpqLLkemhIIj7Sd993v1eHC9gXqSbufKL3Q9m2PpeRght8k =JDdx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ~~~ PGPBLUE 2.5 ... The family that shoots together shouldn't be messed with! 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: George Hannah Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 24 Aug 94 18:48:58 Subject: Encryption... This month's Popular Science has an article titled "Encryption: Cracking the uncrackable code", which explains how a team of about 600 volunteers cracked a message encoded using RSA 129. The article gave me the impression that since the 2 prime numbers used in the RSA 129 algorithm were calculated, and have been published, that any crypto system using RSA 129 is now compromised. Can anyone tell me how this relates to PGP, or if it even does? ... Why be Politically Correct when you can be RIGHT? 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Rick Munday Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jerome Greene 24 Aug 94 22:07:00 Subject: Signature Test -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- While moving through Cyberspace Jerome Greene was heard to say: RM> Hope the -'s are all intact this time! Will someone let RM> me know how this comes out???? JG> Everything looks good here. Jerome, Thanks for the reply. Finally got the bug out! Mail Door was pulling them off. Everything is peaches and creme now. :) ttyl, Rick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLlwK5wRh3UW/7wZFAQEhwwQAldZRaJuE+26Bf7z1QGItoSWt0GDV1c4f Mj+claJv/7D+0mjqKw2ZNLefLd/eoPDHCubrD3vuGIMoXTu0FYXhGbBjvhTiU3iJ MDIxstC4ETDFYps4IIF79PgFWldpeWeQfLvdWSBQ4OgIIm2shASECRxYtaOmhPuB EjmEMIvEgQQ= =2TM8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ~~~ PGPBLUE 2.0 ... Echomail is my life... Oh God!!! Somebody shoot me!... ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Shawn K. Quinn Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jim Grubs 16 Aug 94 16:02:34 Subject: more PGP hoaxing -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- *** Quote: Jim Grubs to Christopher Baker on 13 Aug 94 18:02:00 *** Subject: more PGP hoaxing CB> Steve Winter is now being imitated in usenet with a phony PGP key just CB> as Ralph Stokes was about a month ago. JG> And his "forged" Fido Crucifixion article is being spread on Usenet JG> signed with the phoney key. (Via an anonymous remailer, of course.) JG> How do we get everyone to delete it? The key? Well, the best I can come up with is disabling it, and set its trust value to 2 for "untrusted". Anyone who signed the phony key also merits a trust value of "untrusted" at least in my book. SKQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLlEpczzG+cClnFb5AQHIAgP9EyG12siyLtCiPH8coCqV2oVUb1+8cTXW 0TNr3mauxl1ABvTqENHG/C0PvWvoSbe5tZ4tz4gUml5AxPrz6f7Wuq0xdAC5jH/C ieNd9O6GzOQBTuChj8CSIgnjQp8BoW2yDE4DNkHK/duooCRmcoaD77YZlwN4qZOZ hNAJ/LToAD0= =Zsh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Shawn K. Quinn Area: Public Key Encryption To: Shawn McMahon 16 Aug 94 16:10:12 Subject: Gary Mirkin's public -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- * Reply to msg originally in FidoNet: Public Key Distribution Echo *** Quote: Shawn McMahon to Scott Miller on 13 Aug 94 16:26:18 *** Subject: Gary Mirkin's public SM> If he doesn't sign his key, you can't verify that one byte didn't get SM> changed along the way and make the key you're adding to your keyfile SM> totally invalid. SM> If he DOES sign his key, you can at least verify that the key you SM> added signed itself, and thus wasn't munged along the way. SM> True, it doesn't protect against a deliberately-inserted false key, SM> but it does help protect against a mangled one. Doesn't it also make it possible for someone to forge a secret key compromise, or am I missing something? SKQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLlErLjzG+cClnFb5AQHYlAQAhmtff22ggQPVYQrqM0MDWX4QOjS+UW8d YB9hOqL+aBPf9IMwVM1wumQ4OurTDSwDv9icPAIALBf59nijBoDTNFec4QKFGGQl cWOhvv6Q8Hv/q3S9xVmAWufcS8MA85VbfEYUue6JrxTO2KHn7IN3vvS+7+Z9f/6m fFPBqp1CntM= =Jh/+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: David Chessler 25 Aug 94 02:52:18 Subject: Re: Pgp2.6a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated: 22 Aug 94, David Chessler was quoted as saying: DC> urge you to keep PGP 2.6 MIT on the board (here as PGP26.ZIP), since DC> I know that one works (If it's already been deleted, let me know, 2.6a[lternate] was not hatched as a replacement for 2.6 nor did it have the replace line activated in the .TIC file. it is just what it sez it is and nothing more. TTFN. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6a Comment: PGP 2.6 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAgUBLlw/lssQPBL4miT5AQHXowP/ZCbTyeYHJOqDGLIJOHIphBzqqKc4cemq RMMN8XwKwbAkW/3XEtzCnzU5Lxd8/VOI/SItFJIdUqMGU6MrXLRESlDWbYBD1S7I GQ4KlEeXb+hB1qNZKW3pvZZhOSHKToODIvzWyF24WDPFxQtoOGOQTXON834o7qtR OUeVtKyup2w= =Mn7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Brian McMurry Area: Public Key Encryption To: Tim Bradley 24 Aug 94 01:22:42 Subject: Re: PGP & Point Software -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Fri 19-Aug-1994 9:29p, Tim Bradley wrote: TB> Do you have any "program" names that you're aware of? None that I remember. You can ask the author of PGPSendMail (the closest thing I have online) Peter Simons . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLlowKt2dg1OWsljdAQHWXQQAqiXmG7rxZ+FGOeKIbJG6QPIj/6+diBCW YaH/7tBq/s9YN9CXdFT6hhAojD9vmzELyW/Msk4iGUj5vxSub8BU8fiMBNfTX49w O1r7n/xptEoKeouTUFFV5zrxu23AqmrcT5A7p9mpyC3YyA5DwT3kILHthNhA3sY3 5fhp6XECYXU= =GXrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718