From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Martin Pollard 7 Aug 94 08:52:40 Subject: The battle on other fronts... --> Note: Copied (from: MODERATOR) by jason carr using timEd. Martin Pollard wrote in a message to Rick Ashworth: MP> Sadly, "Use PGP!" seems to be the usual knee-jerk response MP> of its proponents whenever an issue concerning authenticity MP> is involved. Yeah, I know what you mean. It's almost as irritating as going to the doctor and he keeps wanting to =prescribe= stuff and recommend healthy diet and the cessation of smoking. Is this guy monomaniacal or =what=? MP> It's just one more reason why I'm not turned MP> on to PGP (not to mention the extremely high levels of MP> paranoia that seem to surround the whole concept). I'm with ya. Have you seen how often they wash their hands? And those silly masks they wear in surgery? These guys must really be neurotic. jason COLLEGE 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Scott Mills 7 Aug 94 15:45:20 Subject: Question or two -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - --> Note: Reply to a message in PKEY_DROP. PR> Apparently it is ok to post one's public key but where is it ok to PR> send encrypted messages? SM> Why encrypt a message on a public echo? The purpose of Because it's technically feasible. Right now I'm running an encryption-allowed echo in Dallas that's being polled over into Ft Worth. SM> echomail is for everyone to read it. You can send encrypted SM> mail through netmail though. All the "in" people in the echo can read every msg. Here's how, edited for length: ===excerpt=== :: ------------------------------------------------------------- :: Sets echo respondents in one variable (multiple recipients) :: 4df65099=me! :: 79410d5d=ls :: 98cbe9bd=th :: ------------------------------------------------------------- set echo=0x4df6 0x7941 0x98cb :group :: ------------------------------------------------------------- :: This will encrypt the msg with all the hex IDs in %ECHO% :: ------------------------------------------------------------- pgp timed.msg %echo% -ea -o timed.msg goto switch ====end excerpt===== jason -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkVl4UjhGzlN9lCZAQFJMwQAsPXCVkvFM/mLbLiuSr+BSezFtwFx0wlT tdQRWHZLvkc+vovrH2pdNKq6qKZ2C87akDMHBtgGTZ4Myc56uSgzIugFOg2xsF/Z srgiVxvyy9twPls+nKwcLjq0ysZPGh+CXExX/WWXNJXE12Gi2P+n2vl3/D9T9Vvp XSN2sa7ZiLM= =rqiz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ...Key fingerprint = 60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Rand Wacker Area: Public Key Encryption To: Matthew Carey 7 Aug 94 14:53:00 Subject: New ITAR Indictment Matthew Carey said this: MC> IH>Reprinted with permission from the Chicago Sun-Tribune, 5 July MC>1994: MC> IH>From Sun-Tribune Wires MC> IH>violation of ITAR munitions export laws in MC> IH>connection with the operation of the infamous 'We got yer nudes MC> IH>here' BBS. MC> RW> Just click your heels together and say three time, "It's only MC> RW> a joke...I hope." MC> RW> This is the scariest thing I've read in a long time. MC> If it were true yes. As it's not true, you can either check MC>yourself for having fallen for it or clap your hands in celebration MC>of the pranksters among us. Or both. I know it's only a joke, only a joke, only a joke... =) -Rand MC>... "You'll all be eating roach crap by the turn of the century!" Cute, what's that from? ___ * CMPQwk #1.4 * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Tom Almy Area: Public Key Encryption To: jason carr 4 Aug 94 12:40:00 Subject: Net 106 still at it? -----BEGIN GPG SIGNED MESSAGE----- -=> Once upon a time, jason carr said to Christopher Baker <=- JC> But that would effectively cut off the flow to 106 (houston, I JC> think) where they delete any msg with the string "GPG" in it. CB> they do not deliberately alter or censor mail in Net 106 do CB> they? jc> I have read (in BBSLAW?) that any echomail coming into the 106 area is jc> screened for the string "GPG" and is directed > nul. It's pretty easy to solve that problem. jc> Time for a little netmail to find out for sure, I s'pose? But what if jc> they filter NetMail as well... My note would never get there... If they they did, they would be violating Policy 4 -- mail must either be delivered or returned. Tom -----BEGIN GPG SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkFD9tmt3ugi2IbhAQHHHAQAnvJrgYQ/+5b/33fOhfsHoQpOIfLdCMuy TYWlBAybgTy+XuvW53ppTZNm7LqAQ720PkpQqwt4NC4INylSsBCahco6jY8lsey/ z2qxcUy7jE+C0fU/E15GcGN5KkYvzo1656iO4VNnwFtKc+XZ+wiocoYgiFxAVQt7 YzRNuFmbVyY= =KRQW -----END GPG SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718