From: Kayla Block Area: ENOCHIAN To: All 8 Apr 94 01:46:08 Subject: Enochian 101 UpdReq 93 all, though i have been longing to do enochian probably from the time i first got into magick, i have waited and waited instead. a few months ago, i 'promised' myself that once i had accomplished a few basic goals in my yoga practices, that i would finally 'allow' myself to start enochian. so, at this point, i'm just about finished with a set of enochian boards, and gearing up for jumping on in. over the years i've read a bunch of stuff, (ranging from schueler crap to the enochian world of aleister crowley, to mysteria magica, and even some dee). but, i really don't have any idea of where to start. scrying the aethyrs? invocations? evocations? etc. etc. any suggestions? 93, ---kayla 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Phil Pope Area: ENOCHIAN To: Christeos Pir 6 Apr 94 03:48:00 Subject: Enochian "style" UpdReq > If you like, I can send you a copy of my essay on Enochian Hi Christos, your essay arrived in the mail yesterday. It made it through customs completely intact. Many thanks. I have uploaded it to several BBS and made it available for Freq. Another friend is going to print it and distribute it that way to his Thelemic minded but computerless friends. Once I have finished distributing it in Aust. I may have a chance for a good read through. Thanks again. LVX Phil 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Julia Phillips Area: ENOCHIAN To: Paul Hume 7 Apr 94 23:35:02 Subject: TRUE AND FAITHFUL UpdReq Hello Paul! 04 Apr 94 08:19, Paul Hume wrote to Solaris: PH> In the absence of the original Dee mss. it is, for many of us, PH> the source document on Enochian (though those who have studied PH> his original documents warn, no doubt rightly, that Casaubon's PH> edition is somewhat corrupt). My ex-partner, Rufus, took a photocopy of the Casaubon into the BL, and corrected it against the original documents. There *are*, as you quite rightly point out a considerable number of errors in it, and if I can ever get to the bottom of my archives, I'll find the corrected copy and make it available. Just don't hold your breath, as it's something like box 25 of 26 :) B*B Julia 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Josh Norton Area: ENOCHIAN To: The Cegorach 8 Apr 94 14:44:00 Subject: General stuff UpdReq Thus said The Cegorach to Josh Norton concerning General stuff: TC> the MP seemed like a chakra working anyway, I figured I'd go "to the TC> source", so to speak, and do a "real" chakra working...or maybe it was TC> Rose I mentioned this too. Must have been Rose, unless my memory is f*cked up again. JN> the next three with Binah, etc. ZAX being the 10th Aethyr it would be JN> associated with the highest aspect of Chesed, which Crowley decided JN> was the experience of the Babe of the Abyss. TC> Heck--now why didn't I get this response to the "Terminology" thread TC> when I asked just what an Aethyr was, and the relation (if any) to the TC> Sephiroth? :) I was wondering how, if at all, they "mapped" onto each TC> other. I mean, just because ten divides evenly into 30.... To be honest, I don't recall seeing that message. But maybe I saw it and chickened out. It's a lot easier to say what an Aethyr isn't than saying what it is... ... I seem to be a verb. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.10 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718