Dear Thelemites; Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Update time on the Falcon vs. OTO thing. I have yet to actually receive the official letter of suppression, but I gave BaphoNet's address to the OTO on the phone last night, and thereby heard that it is most certainly on the way. When I was younger, and a bit more enthusiastic, I sold many xeroxed copies of a number of typescripts of books of Crowley's, such as Liber Aleph, The Gospel According to St. Bernard Shaw, and Atlantis. I sold plain xeroces of the published editions of Olla, The Equinox of the Gods, and others. All of this was at cost, or less. (I paid for the gas from the Post Office to the copy shop and back to the Post Office....) They were not beautifully bound, nor wonderfully printed, and as such drew no adulation from the book collectors, in fact quite the opposite, but they were very popular with Students. I saw these last as a very important segment of our admittedly small population, and one that was not going to be served, or addressed by, the expensive but much more well produced (and out of print) editions of 93 Publishing, Duckworth, Weiser, Llewellyn, Level, Dove and others. My editions also had no appeal to those seeking those professional editions. They only went to those who could not afford, but still had need for, the public domain information otherwise inaccessible in the more valuable form. I see the files on BaphoNet as much the same thing. It's no longer a price difference, but a basic difference in use and function. The forms are not really comparable. While you may try to license a piece of software like a book, it is not, in fact, a book. And even if it could be considered such, what are the actual economics here? Despite those who would consider a lengthy long-distance call cheaper than buying the book, and thereby possibly making it less likely that a person would buy the book, there are entirely other issues here. The files are not replacements for books, and most constructively serve entirely other purposes. Printed books are much easier to read, for pages at a time, on paper than on a screen, but in electronic form they are far more easily searched. In book form, they are transportable to any place humans are, and although computers are at that portability now, the readability question is magnified, if I may.... In book form, they are an object of accruing value (assuming decent handling) while in electronic form, they are never valuable in a mercantile sense. (at least if they are in the public domain and people have public access, such as I am trying to provide.) In short, I do not see the impact of my file list on their bottom line, and it yanks my chain to have them dictate to me what to not have on my board, especially when they appear to be unwilling or unable to provide as good or complete information. Motta would have said, perhaps, that they are trying to rob the world of part of what they say their product is, so that their half-assed product will not suffer by comparison, let alone that they should be troubled to incorporate the missing material. But Motta is dead, and they are not, and the world isn't changed much either way, so far as I have seen in my short and foolish life. I am therefore boycotting their editions until such time as they show as much regard for the dissemination of information as they presently do for profit. (Jes' thought I'd warn other sysops too, Falcon seems a bit too litigious at the moment...) Love is the law, love under will. Antony Wm. Iannotti Sysop, Baphonet-by-the-Sea (718)499-0513 @ 14,400/9600/2400/300 baud (718)499-9277 @ 2400/1200/300 baud