From: jason carr Area: Public Key Encryption To: Tom Almy 9 Aug 94 21:08:38 Subject: Net 106 still at it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Tom Almy wrote in a message to jason carr: jc> Time for a little netmail to find out for sure, I s'pose? But what if jc> they filter NetMail as well... My note would never get there... TA> If they they did, they would be violating Policy 4 -- mail TA> must either be delivered or returned. NetMail, yes. Echomail is not addressed in P4. :( jason -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkhTBUjhGzlN9lCZAQH+vgP/TtF3/q1uF69kcg5JqTDdI6TzE2UWjdI5 hIMbnpWuEXxxI458EdUuYi8GrsROhPNAhtXSw2Z1V2HjEBQexjYuEHH4GwsVzihO GpydCvdDJhdilMZcyftWWPxrOuOHtSjUaAU5QxAppz+bCWdZk5NnjOHfOnfpuxft 3MI0tNMyfH4= =Nulp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ...Key fingerprint = 60 97 B2 AE 7D 90 11 2F 05 1C 35 98 E9 B9 83 61 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: John Schofield Area: Public Key Encryption To: Tony Iannotti 9 Aug 94 11:54:02 Subject: PGP 2.6ui -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- --====-- TI> I am experiencing a very odd side effect of upgrading to 2.6ui. It TI> wants to write to the pgp directory. I usually keep that on a TI> write-protected floppy. 2.3 never minded the write protection, except TI> when doing key management. TI> Has anyone else noticed this, and if so, found a way around it? I TI> prefer to keep the floppy write protected. Thanks! It's probably the RANDSEED.BIN file that it's writing to. There is a config file line called RANDSEED= that lets you keep your randseed.bin file anywhere. JMS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: Call +1-818-345-8640 for information on Keep Out iQCVAgUBLkfNMWj9fvT+ukJdAQFHFgP/eUDLprIW2js1/IwQphGOKfMbxM2DbP4u s+K/4k4Xe/YHC4fosyEWxh1iFczUXwFD6SGrQ2r+hyiEqYnVLEXGVlnVbYaP73hT cvPc1xZf5oPVBs4Zfh78ggw/xlV/+4dt6jMx+isVKoe2AyPGxu5fXhPoN1xgGwtD 4ExhM4z9eqA= =MwGQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- **EZ-PGP v1.07 ... There is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Walt Haefner Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 9 Aug 94 23:21:04 Subject: My pgp key Submitted for your approval..... a public key that has just exited.....the PGPBLUE ZONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (insert dramatic music here.) --==[ WALT ]==-- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6 mQCNAi4rnnEAAAEEAN0xd9VBE3zxIXptYHd2SeB/RGESpNjbQw9TVxLt8w6rnmTQ qxbZajtFEEj4MhjG/gE76wl1WqrYC/HF0iw/GIm+t+RBlmKpaYTBU5tUaw5Aso3R 82QjHHgEOpFrVAtMUk18+cwnXmErqgAia9D5nt+omL9+beguuXNdSyItpAJBAAUR tAxXQUxUIEhBRUZORVI= =9f0S -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- ~~~ PGPBLUE 2.5 ... !.emoh ta siht yrt T'NOD esaelP !!SDIK 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: George Hannah Area: Public Key Encryption To: John Schofield 9 Aug 94 17:21:18 Subject: Re: Remailer -=> Quoting John Schofield to All <=- JS> I am currently looking for Fidonet SysOps willing to beta-test REMAIL. JS> REMAIL is currently vaporware. I estimate that at my current rate, a JS> beta-test version will be available in a month. (So if someone ships JS> me a crate of Capios, expect it in a week. {grin}) John, I would like to beta test such a program. Please netmail me when the beta version is available. ... Five card stud, nothing's wild, and the sky's the limit 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Mike Riddle Area: Public Key Encryption To: Reed Darsey 8 Aug 94 06:56:08 Subject: Re: 2.3a vs 2.6 keys In a message to Mark Carter on Aug 06 94 at 19:09, Reed Darsey wrote: RD> Will be added to the following key: RD> So, my "2.3a" key is still "in" there, with a combination RD> of my older and newer userids. Should I send a message RD> directly to the keyserver to remove my key and then add my RD> key having only my newer IDs? You want your revoked key to stay there as revoked, so the word that it was revoked gets out. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Zorch Frezberg Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jess Williams 10 Aug 94 05:33:20 Subject: `OTHER` PGP-TYPE PROGRAMS In a msg on , Jess Williams of 1:382/502 writes: JW> There is a program called RIPEM which is another Public Key Type JW> Program also based on the RSA algorithm. Instead of using IDEA JW> for its conventional cipher it uses DES. I think it also has JW> another option for the conventional routine. There are a JW> number of Public Key encryption programs out there but those JW> are the two all time favorites. Canada also has a program JW> it likes to use called PKSCRYPT. Hope this helped. The local police used a DES-"cracker" on a system, thinking that the STACKER.VOL on a disk was actually encrypted information. Of course, this is also the same 'computer expert' who claims the FBI sent out a notice on a "modem virus" which activated during data transfers on-line... The DES 'cracker' is available at the least to local level law enforcement, which means that it's also most likely out there for Joe Average to play with. -zf- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: Todd Rourke 10 Aug 94 19:51:04 Subject: Re: routing -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated: 09 Aug 94, Todd Rourke was quoted as saying: TR> I have tried... I have tried... unfortunately politics in R16 tend TR> to be rather skewed against SecureMail. what have politics got to do with it? it's a personal choice by each volunteer and no one may say them nay. TTFN. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: PGP 2.6 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAgUBLkln28sQPBL4miT5AQFrJwP+KM0cdQmQXdaDrBQjkSoeHPayu908O/rb SC4+HeWxNtQe5lmQHQ1RAAAfsIDtJ6FenOSIASdKtEkDvhAoCNIUt9E6JOw7bTih yY5ec1obh/gljcn6By/0tZ6+zAuxD8TzEHIhaKXoujsEbXT5Rm87rqGpNP+vcL4E iQKqNz2ij4M= =JutD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: Scott Miller 10 Aug 94 21:40:44 Subject: Re: Re: overquoting? [Was: My public key] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated: 09 Aug 94, Scott Miller was quoted as saying: SM> No, but I was calling remote, so I couldn't stop it from tossing. don't you hate it when that happens, too? [grin] thanks. TTFN. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: PGP 2.6 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAgUBLkmBkMsQPBL4miT5AQFLawP/faJyxHPCFQZ+gkxOfCkSkKzhLzUbNcft 1D03F+9VxjsoQc/vbGM0TR68Pz6z2/xr/8pu4fcXqR8s+arjnDYc2sIKaraPFAX/ pAwGSGIqfYsszdeTLOrx3QIQRcCG4snLWibq/b5tQNRTefL7bts2QS4SpPv/Cvxk cYWGj++Diu4= =8hoE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jack Mooney Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jim Cunningham 6 Aug 94 17:05:28 Subject: Want source for PGP26.ZIP 16 Jul 94 22:38, Jim Cunningham wrote to Jack Mooney: ->> -> JC>> I am trying to find a source for PGP26.ZIP. ->> ->> It's still here Jim! I checked the logs, and don't know what ->> might ha you to miss it. I'm thinking of making a section for ->> PGP related file well... - -+- GoldED 2.42.G0214 -+---BEGIN JC> JC> Thanks, I found it on another board. and besides that the SYSOP JC> of my local BBS had found it and put it on our local BBS. JC> TNX , Jim Hehehe... I sent the file down there on my own dime after I read the message you left to me. I'm glad Bill (da sysop there) saw fit to make it available! #--------------------------------------------------------------------------# | | FidoNet 1:2613/108 -Net SecureMail Host-| | Hunter's Quay BBS 716-339-9777 | Freq PGP26.ZIP and FILES for full list.| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------| | PGP public key available upon request. Freq PGPKEY | #--------------------------------------------------------------------------# 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jack Mooney Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 6 Aug 94 17:16:24 Subject: Net 106 still at it? [Was: New to PGP] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 01 Aug 94 14:14, Christopher Baker wrote to Jason Carr: CB> In a message dated: 30 Jul 94, Jason Carr was quoted as saying: JC>> But that would effectively cut off the flow to 106 (houston, JC>> I think) where they delete any msg with the string "PGP" in JC>> it. CB> they do not deliberately alter or censor mail in Net 106 do they? I certainly hope that they wouldn't. I have friends down there! At worst, I'd hope that the offended system would return the "offending" mail to the sender as undeliverable. But even that practice, (and I know it exists), is unethical and inconsistent to a society supposedly holding freedom of communication in high favor. - --Jack-- - --- GoldED 2.42.G0214 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkP/GdVgCqJo49UdAQGyRwP/abJ5soOugGSHp0pdkRovxBFKNhFhvhGj ZIPVCdbhEQVQ9tMKl/stbZZzy5wmL2V3RFGrDRk8iuGftIvEjqNwLhNg+95fZM+C Ck1LBCxmTNlxPseqcvPrfWsVm93DbE16NmZAskRceIeU7R7HdoJYV/zas3HL6H9M 4HnWFquIda0= =DWWM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jack Mooney Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jerome Greene 6 Aug 94 17:23:20 Subject: New to PGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 31 Jul 94 11:33, Jerome Greene wrote to Ryan Shaw: RS>> signatures the norm in Fight-o-Net? Also, what is the view RS>> on the use of PGP signatures in Fight-o-Net echos? JG> It seems to me IMO, that most, if not all echoes present excepted JG> :-) view digital signatures as a waste of band-width. In many echoes, I feel it might be a waste of bandwidth. A signature generally isn't required wrt the general chit-chat and normal flaming... I would strongly support the use of signatures on articles, and bulletins. The recent Winter, and the numerous other hoaxes might have been prevented, and much more bandwidth saved. Of course, Fido policy makers, like federal authorities, seem to like to put the cart before the horse. JG> ... An ounce of security is worth a pound of defense. You got that right! And you got the RIGHT! Support PGP - --- GoldED 2.42.G0214 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCUAgUBLkQBXtVgCqJo49UdAQGVUgP0Dm7ruEbvvg7VvtfU6tqQHkST4+ifcsSm TZUq7Rjk2Zhxp2uOfX7OljwkQSMBy3DJXVIsJiR1jWm7pbL7AW8hRHHFPhc5vzUa qttVtoF2NdsE4cKs0hsu4XWJlgY1OtSvvKRK8m8xOLgsS8GvlzOWXZYGpisPhF1e X3AHAkYdIQ== =M/hN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Shawn McMahon Area: Public Key Encryption To: jason carr 11 Aug 94 11:12:12 Subject: New to PGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Despite the stern warnings of the tribal elders, jason carr said this to Shawn McMahon: jc> I'm just saying (perhaps with moderator's bias) that it's polite jc> to ask first. Jason, it'd be polite to send netmail asking if you could post ANYTHING in an echo before you ever post it. It'd also be quite silly. Do you really want the assumption to be "can't sign my messages, unless told differently?" Me, I'd rather the assumption be "can sign my messages, unless told differently." That can't, and SHOULDN'T, be done through Policy. The only way it'll ever happen is if a large number of people start routinely signing their messages. Signing echomail is not something to which there is legitimate objection; therefore, you should treat it like you would the word "gnarly." If a moderator wants to object to you using "gnarly" in his echo, that's his right; but it doesn't mean that, once it happens, you should ask the moderators in every other echo for permission before you use the word again. The same is true of clear-signing your messages. Would you ask somebody's permission before you scrawled your signature on the bottom of a note you placed on a real-world cork bulletin board? No, of course not. However, if the owner of that board asked you to stop signing your notes, you'd certainly do it. The same is true of digital sigs. Yes, moderators own their echoes, and yes, they have every right to throw you out if you refuse to follow their instructions. But it's not your obligation to find out what changes are going to be made in those instructions on the spur of the moment. If that echo doesn't publish a rule against signing messages, then it doesn't HAVE one. You're under no obligation to live by a rule that might exist at some future date. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkoHdebJC2KuabptAQHmGQP/QGtA0VPKpinW4ta9HbirYLar6JIIYYc0 sPjWds6mkmC+SfIawSfeYATiPXR4S7bsBxnEvhycNhiMM0+CmwI1hsCybfJGledP lf5Z52eMQS2MUuu4XNkUKFGPzrB5yvOW6lWp2oNcxGHXBVnOSOFlMMrcGj9qbeGQ bzWeHrrUyTk= =a7mB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Shawn McMahon Area: Public Key Encryption To: Jim Cannell 11 Aug 94 11:14:58 Subject: Censorship -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Despite the stern warnings of the tribal elders, Jim Cannell said this to Mike Lenker: JC> It probably would not be out of line to work towards an JC> alternative EchoMail distribution system which is free of JC> such silly restrictions as well. Net 106 has one already. However, I'd like to point out that such a system exists for everybody who cares to join it; Planet Connect. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAgUBLkoILubJC2KuabptAQELkAP/fSLeQgKulIRvmArHpgAkdSvNr/CI1wAs Pt77fXhaCVpYJoz3hU7vxcuSHWBR/WusSZlatyVp9/nq+SIPjTu0fn/LMWJJ4858 4o0m4jmyCiKBLBKhtFgQEe4ybc/OLABK4WByBw+ftrjGwh3hW5FRDoCaYgXK/kHl sVLo8jQD59A= =UTVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Shawn McMahon Area: Public Key Encryption To: Wes Landaker 11 Aug 94 11:18:12 Subject: PGP Legal_Kludge! Despite the stern warnings of the tribal elders, Wes Landaker said this to Gary Mirkin: WL> Even if they don't, it won't be long until someone else writes WL> something that include source code. It's not like it's a particularly difficult task; the algorithms and example source code for both RSA and IDEA are published, as are MD5 and some strong random number generators. Between those, you could write a PGP-compatible program. Oh, I don't mean to imply that it'd be easy, or that anybody could sit down in a weekend and hack it out; but a competent programmer with time on his hands could do it, no problem. And one that ISN'T PGP-compatible? Take more design time, potentially less coding time. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Walt Haefner Area: Public Key Encryption To: all 8 Aug 94 15:01:18 Subject: Keep Out premier issue ::To: All From: John Schofield Subj: Keep Out premier issue :: ---------------------- JS> Keep Out magazine is a small, bi-monthly magazine I'm starting to JS> help promote data encryption, privacy, and personal freedom. If JS> anyone has any questions about the magazine, feel free to ask here or JS> in private email. What follows is a press release I am sending to JS> many local BBS's. Feel free to pass it around if you like. JS> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- JS> Someone is watching you. JS> This isn't some paranoid fantasy, but a real-life horror story. JS> With every transaction you make with a credit card, every JS> withdrawal you do at an automated teller machine, every telephone call JS> you make--local or long-distance--someone or some machine is recording JS> what you buy and who you call. JS> Depending on where you work, your employer may be monitoring your JS> electronic mail, even bugging your at-work telephone conversations. JS> Amazingly, all of this is perfectly legal. JS> In the United States we have a constitutional right to privacy, JS> but that right is being threatened--usually not by would-be dictators JS> or demagogues, but by well-meaning people who are simply misguided. JS> An example of this is the Clinton administration's Clipper Chip JS> initiative, which would put an encryption device inside every JS> telephone and computer. Good, so far, but there is a catch. The JS> government would keep a copy of the keys to the encryption devices-the JS> equivalent of being required to give the government a copy of the keys JS> to your house. JS> A 1991 senate bill would have mandated back doors in all JS> communications products. Luckily, the bill did not pass, but chances JS> of its being introduced again are high. Another bill the FBI is JS> pushing would require that all communications systems--from the JS> telephone on your desk to the telephone company's high-tech switches-- JS> be designed so the government could listen in. JS> My name is John Schofield, and I created Keep Out because I am JS> frightened. I'm frightened that I will lose my privacy in the future JS> and I'm worried that I have already lost some elements of my privacy JS> today. I want Keep Out to give people complete, accurate, and JS> unbiased information about the options they have in protecting their JS> privacy. JS> Keep Out focuses on the practical side of cryptography, digital JS> money, anonymous remailers, and everything else that can increase your JS> privacy. Those ideas and ones like them can do much to help you keep JS> your personal life private. If you don't know what they are, don't JS> worry--Keep Out will keep you informed. JS> Rather than discuss the obscure branches of mathematics that are JS> the basis for many of these technologies, Keep Out will explain these JS> technologies and discuss what they can do and how you can use them. JS> Stories in progress for the first issue include: JS> * An interview with Philip Zimmermann (the author of the JS> PGP data encryption program), including his thoughts on JS> privacy in the digital age, export controls on cryptography, JS> the copyright on RSA (the algorithm used in PGP), and JS> information on his struggle with US Customs over exporting PGP JS> * A story on the breaking of RSA and what it really means JS> in terms of the security of your messages JS> * A review of the different programs that claim to link JS> PGP with off-line mail-readers JS> * In our beginners' section, an explanation of how public- JS> key encryption works, and how it can work for you JS> In short, Keep Out focuses on who is taking your privacy away JS> from you, and what you can do to get it back. JS> A one-year subscription (six issues) to Keep Out costs US $15. JS> Keep Out can not accept credit-card orders, but checks and money JS> orders payable to "Keep Out" are welcome. JS> The premier issue of Keep Out will reach newsstands everywhere JS> August 1, and a full-text electronic version will be released one JS> month after the paper publication date. JS> For information on advertising, to reach our editorial staff, or JS> for subscription questions, call (818) 345-8640, or write: JS> Keep Out JS> P.O. Box 571312 JS> Tarzana, CA 91357-1312 JS> You can fax Keep Out at (818) 342-5127. You can also reach us JS> through the Internet at "Keep.Out@f903.n102.z1.fidonet.org" or JS> "John.Schofield@f903.n102.z1.fidonet.org," or you can call the Keep JS> Out BBS at (818) 342-5127 and send e-mail to the Sysop. Through JS> Fidonet, you can reach us at "Keep Out" or "John Schofield" at JS> 1:102/903.0. JS> Sincerely, JS> John Schofield JS> Publisher, Keep Out JS> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- JS> Version: 2.6 JS> iQCVAgUBLfQOvWj9fvT+ukJdAQHJ1QQAyTwFrZzBQISP+yGsH7WBKQU8OGvAhmVT JS> oCRcG7S38r0aCWGG8S2yuQ5h/u36bHsXw7BHrXBExv64x9rFBbe7Ol1kjtJ9h7m+ JS> TNmgMxGk1Wtw9pky57TdCIuZv1HDzUqU35F+zXdCaDsc8bFVMlIQm7y3yCavTxT/ JS> IkhEQVXAolw= JS> =KL8d JS> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Scott Miller Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 9 Aug 94 18:02:00 Subject: Re: overquoting? [Was: My public key] No, but I was calling remote, so I couldn't stop it from tossing. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Tim Bradley Area: Public Key Encryption To: jason carr 11 Aug 94 08:56:14 Subject: New to PGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - -> SM> This gives the impression that signing is something special, - -> SM> for which one needs permission, and that it's reasonable to - -> SM> expect that it will not be allowed. - -> - -> I'm just saying (perhaps with moderator's bias) that it's polite to - -> ask first. The PGP crowd is not universally loved, so we need all - -> the good PR we can get. Unruly acts/posts by PGP advocates =hurts= - -> the cause, not helps it. - -> - -> SM> Sign first, stop only if asked. - -> - -> Kind of obnoxious behavior, IMO. I kind of have to split the difference here: the only way that electronic communications can fulfill it's real potential is if verifiability is virtually universal, and only digital signitures will insure that. On the other hand, there IS a lot of misunderstanding and outright paranoia about encryption in general and PGP in particular ... and it doesn't do ANYONE any good to give the key-escrow people even an inch by being antisocial. So, yeah, sign first & stop only if asked, but don't kick and complain if asked, comply immediately, politely, and with a} a clear explanation of WHY digital sig's are useful, and b} a request that disallowing Sig's be mentioned in the Echo rules where anyone who is concerned about the reliability of the Echos contents can immediately know that the echo does NOT allow such protection. Politeness and reasonableness are THE most important points, no matter WHAT you believe the LONG term consequences of lack of free encryption may be, MOST people don't want to think about it, and will only get annoyed if you try to MAKE them. Later Daze, -- Tim Bradley -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: I am Locutus of the NSA: Privacy is irrelevant iQBVAgUBLknSDjDp94PCS+V9AQGf2QIApykKDPUhevBMdm5rfUfjgK6VVVabXC1T eiO5dlT0zhyQti7m1TT/B8bs8oP0UUryTqRulSW5mBJzM37gbFAYJQ== =Oy+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Jason Levine Area: Public Key Encryption To: Brad Ems 10 Aug 94 04:54:00 Subject: Don't forget!!!!!!!! BE>Don't forget that this Friday, August 12th, there will be a free lecture BE>regarding the Clipper Chip, PGP, and computing privacy. Details: BE>When : August 12th, 7:30 p.m. BE>Where : St. Louis County Library Headquarters BE> 1649 S. Lindbergh (across from Frontenac Plaza) BE>Who : Jim Burnes, a local computer consultant will lecture on the BE>Clipper Chip: what it is, how it works, what its pitfalls are, and w BE>it is not needed. BE>Why : Because , and it ain't nobody's business Oh Brad...you seem to have forgotten that this is a NATIONAL conference (is it international?), and that we live all over this great nation. You neglected to include a STATE. :) *** OLX 2.1 TD Think big thoughts, but relish small pleasures. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Alan Pugh Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 10 Aug 94 00:12:30 Subject: pgpblue -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- hello all, i've gotten tired of olx truncating long messages and trashing my signatures. i just installed bluewave and am going to try it out for a while. where can i download the latest version of pgpblue on a first time caller basis? amp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.3a iQCxAgUBLkhheNQ9obngT6LhAQHaHgTdHbj7ptuj8PQB6cv3QMNowRgqb1618d/C rEg9qyKVYe1vX0soOhx/BeYdozH0iRYVNy9o+N9Dr1FlyXpZRo2OhVDB2MNUFqCH 0dHGlzn7AmBe9RyIalanzRT5rvtR0PbLLibTeeaZWgZtGcKvbO8uQbq67No0uqHQ DcufSr41gAzwEUfJEulP+1iQ+Q3QhUO6hw13eJpywq/gDWOx =AUS6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... My hard disk is full! Maybe I'll try this message section thing. 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Scott Miller Area: Public Key Encryption To: Christopher Baker 12 Aug 94 00:52:00 Subject: Re: Re: overquoting? [Was: My public key] Oh yeah, always a problem. Scott 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: Walt Haefner 11 Aug 94 12:49:34 Subject: Re: My pgp key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In a message dated: 09 Aug 94, Walt Haefner was quoted as saying: WH> Submitted for your approval..... a public key that has just WH> exited.....the PGPBLUE ZONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (insert dramatic music WH> here.) you mean the do do DO do, do do DO do? [grin] btw, keys go in the PKEY_DROP Echo. it is available from the same sources as this one. thanks. TTFN. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: PGP 2.6 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAgUBLkpWk8sQPBL4miT5AQFjwgQAg0BC3jh8o6qxGuycvZOhVcUOEGAQpeFg 2TqDGZlGU1KkfSa9YUT/HA/FaxjbHKVA6jDo1xXyFsecSyfw5DlROARjKGFSVhyX bBftj2Z5B6MlpNQygrQLo+o2JtYhIJSJK2hbM02cvk5D3uzykdpIZkrrQezxkDjF aXqH+BA0rpk= =wTJc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718 From: Christopher Baker Area: Public Key Encryption To: All 11 Aug 94 23:36:04 Subject: more PGP hoaxing * Original Message Date: 11 Aug 94 23:34:42 * From: Christopher Baker * To: All * Edited by: Christopher Baker @ 1:374/14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Steve Winter is now being imitated in usenet with a phony PGP key just as Ralph Stokes was about a month ago. Steve Winter has never compiled a PGP key before so anything you see that purports to be such a thing isn't. he has just freqed PGP 2.6 from here and will make a key even if he never uses it just to prevent any more bogus traffic from being claimed as his. i will obtain and post this real key with my signature on it after he studies the docs and generates one. TTFN. Chris p.s. we have a long-time, passworded link in addition to voice verification. C. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 Comment: PGP 2.6 is LEGAL in Zone 1! So USE it! [grin] iQCVAgUBLkruFMsQPBL4miT5AQEgiQP7BexG2DIgNu8rXvpLEzdSfnnCLnKdKiB0 BZhGVKUvodpedLjVcPXK7643Oa3xsQG+Zq71GLiHadFFtj/y7xbZfpmk/LzqoYSO AcITJblROfNyWzr1zoa36is4F6lxtmWaqDQ58CTu70eSKjiT4J123Zk73NO0QO90 r8JcoA/1AYQ= =kG7g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718