From:    Psyber                                 Area: Mundane
To:      Robert Pearson                         22 Mar 95 19:34:54
Subject: Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSED!          UpdReq 

RP> On Tue Mar 14, 1995 (02:15), Derek Carr wrote about RUSH LIMBAUGH IS EXPOSE
RP> 
DC> Pardon my ignorance, but WHO is this Limbaugh guy everyone
DC> is talking about? 
RP> 
RP>      A "right wing" demagogue with his own radio and TV programs. 
Not to mention the right ear of Newt Gingrich....


201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718

From:    Nosferatu                              Area: Mundane
To:      Stranger                               22 Mar 95 23:14:14
Subject: pot                                    UpdReq 

hey man,
    waz up? not much here, comin down ackshullaly....
gimme a call d00d....
                        Nosferatu


201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718

From:    Macfinn                                Area: Mundane
To:      Kihe Blackeagle                        24 Mar 95 11:32:10
Subject: Re: Greetings                          UpdReq 

 Ma> Wish I were there, gotta be better than here. At least the 1st
 Ma> ammendment is still in effect in TX. 
 KB> Hey, we're having to fight down here too.  Would be a 
 KB> little easier if there
 KB> weren't so many *stupid* board operators carrying adult materials where
 KB> kids can access ... not that I am personally too happy 
 KB> with placing age limits on things, either.
 KB> I cannot abide or tolerate censorship on any basis when
 KB> it comes right down to it. Who am I, or who would the censor be, and by
The only personal solution the the *adult* thing that I have over here as 
sysop of this board is that unless I know a person of a face to face and 
personal basis they don't get adult access, and then the only things that I 
have that require adult access is two Podnet echos (Merry Meat and Sex 
Magick).
The -real- problem is not the sysops, it is the parents of the "kids". It is 
they afterall who are and should be solely responsible for their "kids". In 
otherwords, (a)if they don't want the "kids" exposed to cyberspace then (1) 
use and external modem and disconect it during inactivity, (2) lock the 
keyboard (most modern cases come with keyboard locks), (3) password protect 
their systems so that it requires a p-word to boot it, (4) and lastly, 
actually sit down and communicate their desires unto their "kids". This is a 
family matter, and not a -general social- matter; adults should control their 
homes. Parents hopefully lock up or keep out of reach medications, guns, 
bugsprays, ect, out of the reach of their kids; if they, the parent, doesn't 
desire lil' Joey to access cyberspace then they should act accordingly in the 
home and exorsise a little parental control. This is the only solution, and 
it doesn't require an act of congress or some redneck state legslature, just 
good old fashioned plain common sense.
=M=



201434369420143436942014343694201434369420143436942014343694718